A new coal port for Metro Vancouver? Bad idea!

Port Metro Vancouver is currently considering two proposals to expand coal exports: a 6 million tonne (Mt)/yr expansion of Neptune Terminals in North Vancouver, and a brand new coal port on the Fraser River, capable of exporting up to 8 Mt/yr at full build out.  Approval would make Metro Vancouver the biggest exporter of coal in North America.  When burned these coal exports would produce more GHG pollution than all the bitumen shipped through the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline.  This is madness.

The port's public consultation process on these proposals has been simply egregious.  They have not made sufficient effort to inform the broad public of these proposals, and they provide no clear framework for incorporating public input into their decisions.  Currently, Port Metro Vancouver staff alone have authority to make a decision which has huge implications for our future.  This cannot stand.

Please contact the Board of Directors of Port Metro Vancouver today and demand they delay any decisions and open these proposals up to full public review.  Click here to send an email.Please cc us so we can track how many responses they receive -- we'll make sure they are posted publicly.  If the Port Authority won't engage in proper public consultation, we will!

In 2007 public outcry stopped Premier Gordon Campbell from building coal fired power plants in BC.  Today in 2012 our determination can stop the expansion of coal exports.

Are you ready to say "NO!" to fossil fuel exports? Take the pledge to get involved:

I'm part of the 99 percent that doesn't profit from delay and inaction on climate change.  Enough talk -- I commit to working with others to end the production and export of fossil fuels from BC.

Supporters:
  • Recycling Stations
  • Regal Bicycles
  • Premiere Van Lines
  • Drain Rescue Plumbing

  • Latest Posts

    If you work backwards from the numbers, the conclusion is inescapable – we only have a short time to start rapidly reducing emissions, or global warming is going to slip out of control. Some say it already has, but we think that if enough of us take action, we can avoid disaster.

    The argument for a 2015 deadline:

    First, there is broad agreement that if we keep global temperature increases below 2 degrees Celsius, it is “likely” that we’ll avoid irreversible, runaway climate change. Likely, but not for certain, and there is ongoing debate that an increase of even 1.5 degrees above the global, average, preindustrial temperature would be too risky to chance.  Bottom line: everyone agrees that warming above 2 degrees would be a disaster.

    Second, given the relationship between emissions of heat-trapping pollution and resulting increases in temperature, there is also broad agreement that to avoid this 2 degree increase in temperature, emissions from developed nations need to peak by 2015 and rapidly decline for many years after.

    If we miss the 2015 deadline, atmospheric CO2 levels continue to rise and we have to cut back even more steeply, over a shorter time period, to avoid runaway climate change. In short, if we don't start reducing by 2015 -- which will already be hard work -- then it is very unlikely we're going to get it done at all.

    Pages

    Stop Coal
    A new coal port for Metro Vancouver? Bad idea! - stop coal
    http://www.thecompliancecenter.com/labels/ghs/ghs_pictogram.htm